Athletes using legal performance enhancing and medical sport supplements are more likely to dope than those using sport foods and superfoods, a new study reveals.
While some sport supplements may be necessary for an athlete’s programme, taking ergogenic and medical sport supplements may inadvertently lead to sports people developing favourable attitudes towards doping
Researchers at the University of Birmingham and Canterbury Christ Church University are calling for bespoke anti-doping education for athletes using such supplements to prevent them turning to banned substances.
In the first study of its kind, the researchers surveyed 573 athletes competing at club, country, national and international level about their use of four types of sport supplements:
Ergogenic, such as creatine – used to improve performance;
- Medical, such as iron – used to treat clinical issues and nutrient deficiencies;
- Sport foods/drinks, such as protein bars – providing a source of nutrients; and
- Superfoods, such as goji berries – which claim to optimise health and performance.
Publishing their findings in Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, the researchers note that athletes using ergogenic and medical sport supplements to improve performance, through boosting strength and shortening recovery between training sessions can develop the belief that doping is another means to improve performance.
Co-author Christopher Ring, Professor in Psychology at the University of Birmingham, commented: “Our results have important implications for coaches, nutritionists and sport doctors – they must appreciate that athletes who are administered ergogenic and medical sport supplements may develop more favourable attitudes towards doping.
“An athlete using these supplements may come to believe that using chemically active substances is an acceptable way of enhancing sport performance. This belief could then later develop into a rationalisation that doping is just another means to enhance performance.”
Two in five athletes surveyed (42%) used ergogenic supplements, whereas one in five used medical sport supplements (18%) and sport foods and drinks (21%). Superfoods were rarely used (2%). Over half (53%) used at least one sport supplement.
Researchers note that future research such explore how use of one supplement type may lead to another and eventually the use of banned substances – for example, superfood use leads to ergogenic and medical supplement use, which may in turn, lead to doping.
Co-author Dr. Maria Kavussanu, from the University of Birmingham, commented: “Given that athletes using ergogenic and medical sport supplements are more likely to be open to doping, it is important that these sportspeople receive tailored anti-doping education to prevent a potential increase in the use of banned substances.”
For more information please contact Tony Moran, International Communications Manager, University of Birmingham, on +44 7827 832312. Alternatively, contact the Press Office out of hours on +44 (0)7789 921165.
Notes to Editors:
- The University of Birmingham is ranked amongst the world’s top 100 institutions. Its work brings people from across the world to Birmingham, including researchers, teachers and more than 6,500 international students from over 150 countries,
- ‘Athletes using ergogenic and medical sport supplements report more favourable attitudes to doping than non-users’ – Philip Hurst, Christopher Ring, Maria Kavussanu is published by Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport.
- The full paper can be read at https:/
/– please reference this link in any online article. www. sciencedirect. com/ science/ article/ pii/ S1440244020307714?via%3Dihub
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.